Difference between revisions of "Stanford University"
From Open Access Directory
Latest revision as of 07:22, 3 February 2012
This list is part of the Open Access Directory.
- Faculty senate approves measure targeting for-profit journal publishers, a press release issued February 24, 2004. The press release is based on a February 19 vote of the Faculty Senate.
- A slightly revised version of the press release was issued on February 25, 2004.
- Summary: With one dissenting vote, the Faculty Senate voted to encourage "libraries to cancel some costly journal subscriptions and faculty to withhold articles and reviews from publishers who engage in questionable pricing practices. The motion singled out publishing giant Elsevier as deserving special attention. 'We're not doing this to position ourselves to negotiate more effectively with Elsevier,' said University Librarian Michael Keller. 'We're doing this to change the whole scene. We're trying to change the fundamental nature of scholarly communication in the journal industry.'...'I think it's going to take a long time for its prestige and cachet to wear out,' [biology professor Robert] Simoni said. 'There are still so many people who think publishing in Cell is going to make their career that they'll still get submissions. But if institutions like Stanford and others stop subscribing to journals like Cell, authors will eventually realize that their work is not being seen. This is an evolutionary change and it will take time."
- My summary is based on the press release. But also see how the action was recorded in the Faculty Senate minutes.
- Michael Miller, Fac Sen discusses journal fees, The Stanford Daily, February 6, 2004. Stanford discusses how to respond to the serials crisis.
- Ryan Sands, Fac Sen addresses costly journals, The Stanford Daily, February 20, 2004.
- Linda Cicero, At What Cost? Stanford Magazine, June 2004.