Difference between revisions of "Institutional principles for negotiating with publishers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Petersuber (talk | contribs) |
Petersuber (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | * University of North Texas | + | * '''University of North Texas''' |
** [https://library.unt.edu/collection-management/unt-manifesto-expectations-library-vendors/ Expectations for Library Vendors], first released February 2, 2018; subsequently [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1114882/ revised] more than once. | ** [https://library.unt.edu/collection-management/unt-manifesto-expectations-library-vendors/ Expectations for Library Vendors], first released February 2, 2018; subsequently [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1114882/ revised] more than once. | ||
| − | * University of California | + | * '''University of California''' |
** [https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/committees/ucolasc/scholcommprinciples-20180425.pdf The UC principles] themselves, April 25, 2018 | ** [https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/committees/ucolasc/scholcommprinciples-20180425.pdf The UC principles] themselves, April 25, 2018 | ||
*** [https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/rm-jn-transform-scholarly-communication-declaration-2019.pdf Another copy], June 3, 2019. | *** [https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/rm-jn-transform-scholarly-communication-declaration-2019.pdf Another copy], June 3, 2019. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
** [https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/open-access-at-uc/publisher-negotiations/negotiating-with-scholarly-journal-publishers-a-toolkit/ Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California], May 2019 | ** [https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/open-access-at-uc/publisher-negotiations/negotiating-with-scholarly-journal-publishers-a-toolkit/ Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California], May 2019 | ||
| − | * Iowa State University | + | * '''Iowa State University''' |
** [https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cos_reports/1/ The ISU principles] themselves, October 15, 2019 | ** [https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cos_reports/1/ The ISU principles] themselves, October 15, 2019 | ||
** [https://www.lib.iastate.edu/news/faculty-senate-green-lights-negotiation-principles-unanimous-vote Article about the ISU principles], October 19, 2019 | ** [https://www.lib.iastate.edu/news/faculty-senate-green-lights-negotiation-principles-unanimous-vote Article about the ISU principles], October 19, 2019 | ||
| − | * Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | + | * '''Massachusetts Institute of Technology''' (MIT) |
** [https://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/publishing/framework/ The MIT Framework] itself, October 23, 2019 | ** [https://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/publishing/framework/ The MIT Framework] itself, October 23, 2019 | ||
** [http://news.mit.edu/2019/mit-announces-framework-guide-negotiations-publishers-1023 Announcement of the MIT Framework], October 23, 2019 | ** [http://news.mit.edu/2019/mit-announces-framework-guide-negotiations-publishers-1023 Announcement of the MIT Framework], October 23, 2019 | ||
| − | ** [https://library.harvard.edu/about/news/2019-10-23/harvard-librarys-commitment-open-access Harvard Library statement in support of the MIT Framework (part of a larger statement on OA), October 23, 2019. | + | ** [https://library.harvard.edu/about/news/2019-10-23/harvard-librarys-commitment-open-access Harvard Library statement in support of the MIT Framework] (part of a larger statement on OA), October 23, 2019. |
** [https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2019/12/uc-libraries-support-mit-framework/ UCalifornia statement in support of the MIT Framework], December 17, 2019 | ** [https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2019/12/uc-libraries-support-mit-framework/ UCalifornia statement in support of the MIT Framework], December 17, 2019 | ||
** [http://nerl.org/2020/01/21/the-nerl-executive-board-approves-support-for-the-mit-framework-for-publisher-contracts/ NERL endorsed the MIT Framework], January 21, 2020 | ** [http://nerl.org/2020/01/21/the-nerl-executive-board-approves-support-for-the-mit-framework-for-publisher-contracts/ NERL endorsed the MIT Framework], January 21, 2020 | ||
*** [http://nerl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full-NERL-Statement-concerning-negotiations.pdf NERL endorsed it again in its own negotiating principles] (more under NERL below), March 3, 2021 | *** [http://nerl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full-NERL-Statement-concerning-negotiations.pdf NERL endorsed it again in its own negotiating principles] (more under NERL below), March 3, 2021 | ||
| − | * Grand Valley State University (GVSU) | + | * '''Grand Valley State University''' (GVSU) |
** Principles for GVSU negotiations as summarized by librarian A. Scarlet Galvan, January 8, 2020 | ** Principles for GVSU negotiations as summarized by librarian A. Scarlet Galvan, January 8, 2020 | ||
| − | * Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) [consortium] | + | * '''Greater Western Library Alliance''' (GWLA) [consortium] |
** GWLA Licensing Principles, June 12, 2020 | ** GWLA Licensing Principles, June 12, 2020 | ||
** GWLA Model License, last revised November 2019 | ** GWLA Model License, last revised November 2019 | ||
| − | * University of Massachusetts Amherst | + | * '''University of Massachusetts Amherst''' |
** UMass Amherst Framework Principles for Provider Agreements, February 2021 | ** UMass Amherst Framework Principles for Provider Agreements, February 2021 | ||
** Framework for Provider Agreements | ** Framework for Provider Agreements | ||
** Framework for Provider Agreements Frequently Asked Questions | ** Framework for Provider Agreements Frequently Asked Questions | ||
| − | * NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium (NERL) [consortium] | + | * '''NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium''' (NERL) [consortium] |
** NERL demands a better deal, March 3, 2021 | ** NERL demands a better deal, March 3, 2021 | ||
** These are the NERL negotiating principles. | ** These are the NERL negotiating principles. | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
** This blog post has a useful table of the NERL negotiating goals, May 26, 2021. | ** This blog post has a useful table of the NERL negotiating goals, May 26, 2021. | ||
| − | * University of Maryland | + | * '''University of Maryland''' |
** Licensing principles | ** Licensing principles | ||
** Announced May 27, 2021 | ** Announced May 27, 2021 | ||
| − | * FORCE11 | + | * '''FORCE11''' |
** Declaration of Researcher Rights in Negotiating the Future of Scholarly Communication, June 1, 2021 | ** Declaration of Researcher Rights in Negotiating the Future of Scholarly Communication, June 1, 2021 | ||
| − | ** Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL) | + | ** '''Association of Southeastern Research Libraries''' (ASERL) [consortium] |
** Recommended Principles and Terms for Electronic Resource Agreements, version 1.0 dated Spring 2022 (announced February 15, 2022). | ** Recommended Principles and Terms for Electronic Resource Agreements, version 1.0 dated Spring 2022 (announced February 15, 2022). | ||
** Also see the Google Doc version. | ** Also see the Google Doc version. | ||
| − | * University of Washington | + | * '''University of Washington''' |
** UW apparently has similar principles but we haven’t found them yet. U Maryland mentions them (above). | ** UW apparently has similar principles but we haven’t found them yet. U Maryland mentions them (above). | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 16 February 2022
This list is part of the Open Access Directory.
- This list is still under development. Every part of it may change before the official launch, including its title, URL, scope notes, and method of organization.
- This is a list of library and university principles for negotiating with publishers. Some are from consortia rather than individual institutions.
- When possible, include the date of public release.
- Related lists in OAD: University statements on OA
- Also see: Negotiation principles internationally from Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges (ESAC).
- Alphabetical by institution.
- University of North Texas
- Expectations for Library Vendors, first released February 2, 2018; subsequently revised more than once.
- University of California
- The UC principles themselves, April 25, 2018
- Another copy, June 3, 2019.
- Announcement of the UC principles, June 21, 2018
- Berkeley blog post about the principles, July 27, 2018
- Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California, May 2019
- The UC principles themselves, April 25, 2018
- Iowa State University
- The ISU principles themselves, October 15, 2019
- Article about the ISU principles, October 19, 2019
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- The MIT Framework itself, October 23, 2019
- Announcement of the MIT Framework, October 23, 2019
- Harvard Library statement in support of the MIT Framework (part of a larger statement on OA), October 23, 2019.
- UCalifornia statement in support of the MIT Framework, December 17, 2019
- NERL endorsed the MIT Framework, January 21, 2020
- NERL endorsed it again in its own negotiating principles (more under NERL below), March 3, 2021
- Grand Valley State University (GVSU)
- Principles for GVSU negotiations as summarized by librarian A. Scarlet Galvan, January 8, 2020
- Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) [consortium]
- GWLA Licensing Principles, June 12, 2020
- GWLA Model License, last revised November 2019
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
- UMass Amherst Framework Principles for Provider Agreements, February 2021
- Framework for Provider Agreements
- Framework for Provider Agreements Frequently Asked Questions
- NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium (NERL) [consortium]
- NERL demands a better deal, March 3, 2021
- These are the NERL negotiating principles.
- NERL endorsed the MIT Framework in the doc above and in a separate doc, January 21, 2021
- This blog post has a useful table of the NERL negotiating goals, May 26, 2021.
- University of Maryland
- Licensing principles
- Announced May 27, 2021
- FORCE11
- Declaration of Researcher Rights in Negotiating the Future of Scholarly Communication, June 1, 2021
- Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL) [consortium]
- Recommended Principles and Terms for Electronic Resource Agreements, version 1.0 dated Spring 2022 (announced February 15, 2022).
- Also see the Google Doc version.
- University of Washington
- UW apparently has similar principles but we haven’t found them yet. U Maryland mentions them (above).