Difference between revisions of "Institutional principles for negotiating with publishers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Petersuber (talk | contribs) |
Petersuber (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Related lists in OAD: [[University statements on OA]] | * Related lists in OAD: [[University statements on OA]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Also see: [https://esac-initiative.org/guidelines/ Negotiation principles internationally] from Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges ([https://esac-initiative.org/ ESAC]). | ||
* Alphabetical by institution. | * Alphabetical by institution. | ||
Revision as of 13:21, 16 February 2022
This list is part of the Open Access Directory.
- This list is still under development. Every part of it may change before the official launch, including its title, URL, scope notes, and method of organization.
- This is a list of library and university principles for negotiating with publishers. Some are from consortia rather than individual institutions.
- When possible, include the date of public release.
- Related lists in OAD: University statements on OA
- Also see: Negotiation principles internationally from Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges (ESAC).
- Alphabetical by institution.
- University of North Texas
- Expectations for Library Vendors, first released February 2, 2018; subsequently revised more than once.
- University of California
- The UC principles themselves, April 25, 2018
- Another copy, June 3, 2019.
- Announcement of the UC principles, June 21, 2018
- Berkeley blog post about the principles, July 27, 2018
- Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California, May 2019
- The UC principles themselves, April 25, 2018
- Iowa State University
- The ISU principles themselves, October 15, 2019
- Article about the ISU principles, October 19, 2019
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- The MIT Framework itself, October 23, 2019
- Announcement of the MIT Framework, October 23, 2019
- [https://library.harvard.edu/about/news/2019-10-23/harvard-librarys-commitment-open-access Harvard Library statement in support of the MIT Framework (part of a larger statement on OA), October 23, 2019.
- UCalifornia statement in support of the MIT Framework, December 17, 2019
- NERL endorsed the MIT Framework, January 21, 2020
- NERL endorsed it again in its own negotiating principles (more under NERL below), March 3, 2021
- Grand Valley State University (GVSU)
- Principles for GVSU negotiations as summarized by librarian A. Scarlet Galvan, January 8, 2020
- Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) [consortium]
- GWLA Licensing Principles, June 12, 2020
- GWLA Model License, last revised November 2019
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
- UMass Amherst Framework Principles for Provider Agreements, February 2021
- Framework for Provider Agreements
- Framework for Provider Agreements Frequently Asked Questions
- NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium (NERL) [consortium]
- NERL demands a better deal, March 3, 2021
- These are the NERL negotiating principles.
- NERL endorsed the MIT Framework in the doc above and in a separate doc, January 21, 2021
- This blog post has a useful table of the NERL negotiating goals, May 26, 2021.
- University of Maryland
- Licensing principles
- Announced May 27, 2021
- FORCE11
- Declaration of Researcher Rights in Negotiating the Future of Scholarly Communication, June 1, 2021
- Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL)
- Recommended Principles and Terms for Electronic Resource Agreements, version 1.0 dated Spring 2022 (announced February 15, 2022).
- Also see the Google Doc version.
- University of Washington
- UW apparently has similar principles but we haven’t found them yet. U Maryland mentions them (above).