Institutional principles for negotiating with publishers: Difference between revisions

From Open Access Directory
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 127: Line 127:


* '''University of Washington'''
* '''University of Washington'''
** UW apparently has similar principles but we haven’t found them yet. U Maryland mentions them in its principles (above).
** [https://www.lib.washington.edu/cas/sustainable-scholarship/uw-libraries-negotiating-priorities UW Libraries Negotiating Priorities], n.d.

Revision as of 12:46, 18 February 2022

This list is part of the Open Access Directory.

  • This list is still under development. Every part of it may change before the official launch, including its title, URL, scope notes, and method of organization.
  • This is a list of library and university principles for negotiating with publishers. Some are from consortia rather than individual institutions.
    • When possible, include the date of public release.
    • When possible, include associated publicity such as announcements, blog posts, news articles, and interviews.
  • Alphabetical by institution.



A

C

F

G

I

J

  • Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)
    • The JISC page on its role in open access includes sections on "Negotiating a transition to open access", "Requirements for transitional agreements", "Requirements for transformative journals", and "Requirements for green compliant agreements".

L

M

N

  • Norwegian directorate for ICT and joint services in higher education and research (UNIT)

S

U