Institutions implementing the DORA principles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Nancypontika (talk | contribs) |
Nancypontika (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* King's College London, UK. [https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ioppn/assets/korgi-changing-hiring-and-promotion-to-recognise-reproducible-and-transparent-research-practices.pdf Changing hiring and promotion to recognise reproducible and transparent research practices]. | * King's College London, UK. [https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ioppn/assets/korgi-changing-hiring-and-promotion-to-recognise-reproducible-and-transparent-research-practices.pdf Changing hiring and promotion to recognise reproducible and transparent research practices]. | ||
* London School of Economics, UK. [https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/services/Policies-and-procedures/Assets/Documents/respuseCitMet.pdf Statement on the responsible use of citation metrics 2016]. | |||
* Manchester Metropolital University, UK. [https://www.mmu.ac.uk/research/research-integrity/responsible-metrics Responsible use of research metrics]. | * Manchester Metropolital University, UK. [https://www.mmu.ac.uk/research/research-integrity/responsible-metrics Responsible use of research metrics]. | ||
* Oxford University, UK. [https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/information/principles Principles to promote responsible use of research metrics]. | * Oxford University, UK. [https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/services/Policies-and-procedures/Assets/Documents/respuseCitMet.pdf https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/information/principles Principles to promote responsible use of research metrics], 05/25/2016. | ||
* St. George's, University of London, UK. [https://www.sgul.ac.uk/research/research-environment/responsible-research-assessment Responsible research assessment]. | * St. George's, University of London, UK. [https://www.sgul.ac.uk/research/research-environment/responsible-research-assessment Responsible research assessment]. |
Revision as of 07:15, 9 February 2022
This list is part of the Open Access Directory.
This list is still under development. Every part of it may change before the official launch, including its title, URL, scope notes, and method of organization.
- This list includes universities, research centers, research institutions, and funders taking measures to implement the 2013 principles of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).
- There are two main sub-lists: (a) universities, research centers, etc. and (b) funders.
- The list does not contain all DORA signatories, which can be found on the DORA website.
- Alphabetical within each section.
Universities and research centers
- Cambridge University, UK. The responsible use of metrics in research assessment.
- Cardiff University, UK. Statement on responsible research assessment, 02/17/2021.
- Edinburgh University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, 2019.
- Ghent University, Belgium. Vision statement for evaluating research at Ghent University, 11/08/2016.
- Glasgow University, UK. Research evaluation: talking about outputs.
- Imperial College London, UK. Research evaluation.
- King's College London, UK. Changing hiring and promotion to recognise reproducible and transparent research practices.
- London School of Economics, UK. Statement on the responsible use of citation metrics 2016.
- Manchester Metropolital University, UK. Responsible use of research metrics.
- Oxford University, UK. https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/information/principles Principles to promote responsible use of research metrics, 05/25/2016.
- St. George's, University of London, UK. Responsible research assessment.
- Straffordshire University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, February 2020.
- University College London, UK. UCL and the San Francisco Declaration (DORA).
Funders
- Templeton World. Research assessment policy, 2021.
- UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). UKRI publishes new report on responsible research assessment, 2021.
- Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment.