Institutions implementing the DORA principles

This list is part of the Open Access Directory.

• This list includes universities, research centers, research institutions, and funders taking measures to implement the 2013 principles of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).
• There are two main sub-lists: (a) universities, research centers, etc. and (b) funders.
• The list does not contain all DORA signatories, which can be found on the DORA website. It only includes those taking public steps to implement the principles.
• Alphabetical within each section.

---

Universities and research centers

C

• Cardiff University, UK. Statement on responsible research assessment, February 17, 2021. (perma.cc)

G

• Ghent University, Belgium. Vision statement for evaluating research at Ghent University, November 8, 2016. (perma.cc)

I

• Imperial College London, UK. Research evaluation. (perma.cc)

K

• King's College London, UK. Changing hiring and promotion to recognise reproducible and transparent research practices. (perma.cc)

L

• London School of Economics and Political, UK. Statement on the responsible use of citation metrics, 2016. (perma.cc)

M

• Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. Responsible use of research metrics. (perma.cc)

S

• St. George's, University of London, UK. Responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
• Staffordshire University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, February 2020. (perma.cc)

U

• University of Bath, UK. Principles of research assessment and management, February 2017. (perma.cc)
• University of Birmingham, UK. Our commitment to responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
• University of Bristol, UK. Responsible research evaluation. Statement on responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
• University of Cambridge, UK. The responsible use of metrics in research assessment. (perma.cc)
• University of Cape Town, South Africa. Research assessment. UCT statement of support for the principles of the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (perma.cc)
• University of Edinburgh, UK.

• Research evaluation and responsible research metrics, February 5, 2021. (perma.cc)
• Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, 2019. (perma.cc)

• University of Glasgow, UK.

• Research evaluation: talking about outputs. (perma.cc)
• Statement on the use of quantitative indicators in the assessment of research quality. (perma.cc)

• University of Hull, UK. Statement on the use of metrics in the assessment of research, May 2020. (perma.cc)
• University of Kent, UK. Statement on fair assessment of research, February 2, 2022. (perma.cc)
• University of Leeds, UK. Responsible metrics in the assessment of research. University of Leeds responsible research metrics assessment, September 2021. (perma.cc)
• University of Oxford, UK. Principles to promote responsible use of research metrics, May 5, 2016. (perma.cc)
• University of Portsmouth, UK. Research governance. (perma.cc)
• University of Reading, UK.

• Research integrity. (perma.cc)
• Responsible metrics. Statement on responsible metrics for adoption, April 16, 2018. (perma.cc)

• University of Southampton, UK. Responsible research metrics policy, November 20, 2019. (perma.cc)
• University of St. Andrews, UK. Responsible metrics. (perma.cc)
• University College Dublin, Ireland. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics in UCD. (perma.cc)
• University College London, UK.

• UCL and the San Francisco Declaration (DORA). (perma.cc)
• Bibliometrics at UCL. (perma.cc)

• University of York, UK. Policy for research evaluation using quantitative data. (perma.cc)

T

• The Open University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics. (perma.cc)

Funders

T

• Templeton World. Research assessment policy, 2021. (perma.cc)

U

• UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). UKRI publishes new report on responsible research assessment, 2021. (perma.cc)

W

• Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment. (perma.cc)