Research in progress - Revision history

Petersuber at 21:55, 11 July 2016

2016-07-11T21:55:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 11 July 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	** Investigators: Robin Peek ([mailto:peek@simmons.edu email]) and Athanasia Pontika		** Investigators: Robin Peek ([mailto:peek@simmons.edu email]) and Athanasia Pontika
	** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.		** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.


	* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''		* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''

Petersuber at 21:55, 11 July 2016

2016-07-11T21:55:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 11 July 2016
Line 24:		Line 24:

	* ''' It's time we capture those moments of individual frustration and turn them into positive change '''		* ''' It's time we capture those moments of individual frustration and turn them into positive change '''
	[http://oabutton.wordpress.com/ OA Button]		** [http://oabutton.wordpress.com/ OA Button]
	** Main Investigators: David E Caroll and Joseph McArthur		** Main Investigators: David E Caroll and Joseph McArthur
	** Currently in Beta mode~~, Open Access Button~~		** Currently in Beta mode. Millions don’t have access to research they need – we aim to turn these individual injustices into positive change. We’re currently developing the open access button, described here. Throughout development we’ll be posting news, thoughts, media and more on this site so check back regularly! We’re looking for this to be a highly collaborative project, please get in touch with thoughts, suggestions, collaborations and anything else that takes your fancy. Also, we’re mad about twitter – find us at [https://twitter.com/OA_Button @OAbutton] [http://www.openaccessbutton.org/ OA Button] officially launched 18th November 2013 during Berlin11.
	Millions don’t have access to research they need – we aim to turn these individual injustices into positive change. We’re currently developing the open access button, described here. Throughout development we’ll be posting news, thoughts, media and more on this site so check back regularly! We’re looking for this to be a highly collaborative project, please get in touch with thoughts, suggestions, collaborations and anything else that takes your fancy. Also, we’re mad about twitter – find us at [https://twitter.com/OA_Button @OAbutton] [http://www.openaccessbutton.org/ OA Button] officially launched 18th November 2013 during Berlin11.

	* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''		* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''

Hgmorrison at 00:07, 18 May 2015

2015-05-18T00:07:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 17 May 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.		** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.

	* '''[http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2006/08/dramatic-growth-of-open-access-series.html Dramatic Growth of Open Access]'''
	** Investigator: Heather Morrison ([mailto:hgmorris@sfu.ca email])[http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics].
	** Quarterly figures for open access publishing and archiving, growth and analysis. Available in open data, commentary, and peer reviewed versions.

	* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''		* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''
Line 34:		Line 31:
	* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''		* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''
	** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].		** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].

	*'''Open access article processing charges'''
	** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] Investigators, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison] and Stephen Pinfield.

	*'''Resource requirements for small scholar-led open access publishing'''
	** The first phase of this research project involves interviews with scholars involved in publishing to gather qualitative data about resource requirements (e.g. time for editing tasks, help with copyediting, technical support) to inform the development of further studies.
	** [http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/call-for-participation-resource.html Call for participation]
	** [http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/appel-de-participation-exigences-de.html Appel de participation]
	~~Investigator, [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison]~~

	*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''		*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''

Hgmorrison at 13:46, 20 December 2013

2013-12-20T13:46:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 20 December 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:

	*'''Open access article processing charges'''		*'''Open access article processing charges'''
	** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] ~~Investigator~~, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison].		** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] Investigators, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison] and Stephen Pinfield.

	*'''Resource requirements for small scholar-led open access publishing'''		*'''Resource requirements for small scholar-led open access publishing'''

Hgmorrison at 00:35, 20 December 2013

2013-12-20T00:35:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 19 December 2013
Line 35:		Line 35:
	** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].		** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].

	*'''~~Tracking open~~ access article processing charges'''		*'''Open access article processing charges'''
	** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] Investigator, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison].		** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] Investigator, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison].

			*'''Resource requirements for small scholar-led open access publishing'''
			** The first phase of this research project involves interviews with scholars involved in publishing to gather qualitative data about resource requirements (e.g. time for editing tasks, help with copyediting, technical support) to inform the development of further studies.
			** [http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/call-for-participation-resource.html Call for participation]
			** [http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/appel-de-participation-exigences-de.html Appel de participation]
			Investigator, [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison]

	*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''		*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''

Hgmorrison at 00:30, 20 December 2013

2013-12-20T00:30:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 19 December 2013
Line 35:		Line 35:
	** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].		** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].

	*'''~~Open Access Journal Support in Canada~~'''		*'''Tracking open access article processing charges'''
	** Investigators: Donald Taylor ([mailto:dstaylor@sfu.ca email]), Kumiko Vezina ([mailto:kumiko.vezina@concordia.ca email]), Brian Owen ([mailto:Brian Owen brian_owen@sfu.ca email]), Andrew Waller ([mailto:waller@ucalgary.ca email]) and Heather Morrison([mailto:hgmorris@sfu.ca email]).		** This research project is designed to provide benchmarks for open access article processing charges to be reviewed on a regular basis. The first phase of the project involves collecting information about open access article processing fees charged by the minority of DOAJ journals that use this business model. The second phase will look at library expenditures on open access article process charges. [Details http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/10/forthcoming-research-tracking-open.html] [Early results: open access via APC heavily dominated by commercial sector http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/12/open-access-publishing-by-apc-dominated.html] Investigator, first phase: [mailto:heather.morrison@uottawa.ca Heather Morrison].
	** Survey of ~~Canadian university libraries and presses regarding~~ open access journals ~~support, i~~.~~e. journal hosting and support services, readiness of libraries to consider a SCOAP3-like approach to transitioning Canadian scholarly journals to~~ open access. Details ~~on [~~http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.~~com~~/~~2009~~/08/~~open~~-~~access~~-~~journals~~-~~support-in-canada~~.html ~~IJPE~~]~~. Update June 2010~~: ~~early presentation of data at [~~http://ir.~~lib.sfu~~.ca/~~handle~~/~~1892~~/~~10882 CALJ AGM~~]~~. October 2010 presentation of data at~~ [~~http~~:~~//ir~~.~~lib.sfu~~.ca~~/handle/1892/11448 Berlin 2010~~].

	*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''		*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''

Steelgraham at 16:13, 22 November 2013

2013-11-22T16:13:54Z

New page

[[File:oad2.jpeg|60px]] This list is part of the [http://oad.simmons.edu Open Access Directory].

* This is a list of active research projects on open access. To keep entries short, please link to online descriptions or project pages when possible. Please include contact information for the principal investigators.

* Related lists on OAD: (1) [[Research questions]], and (2) [[Volunteer opportunities]].

[[Category:Research about OA]][[Category:Working for OA]]

----

* '''Assessing of the Economic and Social Impact of the Public Domain in the Information Society'''
** This is a project sponsored by the European Commission. Rightscom Ltd is the lead partner. More information on the project and the other project partners can be found [http://www.rightscom.com/Default.aspx?tabid=20397&referrertabid=21615 here]. The project is currently searching for any data sources that will help us to make estimates of the number of public domain works in the EU (literary and artistic works, music and audiovisual material). We are also interested in any data about how public domain works get used. If you can help please e-mail mark.isherwood@rightscom.com. Many thanks in advance.

* '''Defining and Measuring Success Variables of Open Access Journals'''
** Investigators: Robin Peek ([mailto:peek@simmons.edu email]) and Athanasia Pontika
** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.

* '''[http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2006/08/dramatic-growth-of-open-access-series.html Dramatic Growth of Open Access]'''
** Investigator: Heather Morrison ([mailto:hgmorris@sfu.ca email])[http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics].
** Quarterly figures for open access publishing and archiving, growth and analysis. Available in open data, commentary, and peer reviewed versions.

* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''
** Investigators: Bill Hooker ([mailto:cwhooker@fastmail.fm email]) and Graham Steel ([mailto:steelgraham7@gmail.com email])
** This project commenced in Sept '08 whilst in 'beta' within a FriendFeed room. As such, this represents a very small fraction of STM academics whose research is 'buffered' by TA. That said, the Investigators report (here) that this is a solid foundation for additional building upon. Similar to the above, the first results of Phase One were [http://www.scribd.com/doc/11738210/Refs-Wanted-Archive collated], Dec '08.
** As matters stand (April '12), there are now 348 members of the [http://friendfeed.com/rooms/references-wanted References Wanted room] at FriendFeed. The Investigators are keen to roll this out a bit further, hence this inclusion in the OAD wiki.
** initial statistics and some discussion of future directions [http://friendfeed.com/e/a9d0207c-5e83-483e-bbad-b3ddc1c97207/Refs-Wanted-infographic-07-Mar-2009/ here] and [http://ff.im/cCto1 here]

* ''' It's time we capture those moments of individual frustration and turn them into positive change '''
[http://oabutton.wordpress.com/ OA Button]
** Main Investigators: David E Caroll and Joseph McArthur
** Currently in Beta mode, Open Access Button
Millions don’t have access to research they need – we aim to turn these individual injustices into positive change. We’re currently developing the open access button, described here. Throughout development we’ll be posting news, thoughts, media and more on this site so check back regularly! We’re looking for this to be a highly collaborative project, please get in touch with thoughts, suggestions, collaborations and anything else that takes your fancy. Also, we’re mad about twitter – find us at [https://twitter.com/OA_Button @OAbutton] [http://www.openaccessbutton.org/ OA Button] officially launched 18th November 2013 during Berlin11.

* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''
** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:pontika.nancy@gmail.com Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].

*'''Open Access Journal Support in Canada'''
** Investigators: Donald Taylor ([mailto:dstaylor@sfu.ca email]), Kumiko Vezina ([mailto:kumiko.vezina@concordia.ca email]), Brian Owen ([mailto:Brian Owen brian_owen@sfu.ca email]), Andrew Waller ([mailto:waller@ucalgary.ca email]) and Heather Morrison([mailto:hgmorris@sfu.ca email]).
** Survey of Canadian university libraries and presses regarding open access journals support, i.e. journal hosting and support services, readiness of libraries to consider a SCOAP3-like approach to transitioning Canadian scholarly journals to open access. Details on [http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/08/open-access-journals-support-in-canada.html IJPE]. Update June 2010: early presentation of data at [http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/10882 CALJ AGM]. October 2010 presentation of data at [http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/11448 Berlin 2010].

*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''
** Investigators: Heather Piwowar ([mailto:hpiwowar@nescent.org email]) and Todd Vision ([mailto:tjv@bio.unc.edu email]), through [http://dataone.org/ DataONE]
** First, we are developing and evaluating scalable methods to track scientific dataset reuse. We'll then analyze the dataset citations to understand the prevalence and patterns of reuse. Initial approach depends on full-text mining of published literature for gene expression dataset accession numbers.
** Motivation on [http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/studying-reuse-of-geo-datasets-in-the-published-literature blog], and details and open research notes at [http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/DataONE:GEO_reuse_study Open Wet Ware project page].

* '''Society publishers with open access journals'''
** Investigators: Peter Suber ([mailto:peter.suber@gmail.com email]) and Caroline Sutton ([mailto:caroline.sutton@co-action.net email])
** The project has two phases. Phase One is to make a comprehensive list of scholarly societies worldwide that support gold OA for their own journals. Phase Two will survey the societies discovered in Phase One in order to learn details about their turn to OA, their business models, and the financial and academic consequences of their OA policies.
** The first results of Phase One were [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/11-02-07.htm#societies published] in ''SOAN'' for November 2007. However, Phase One is not complete and we are still enlarging our list. The [http://www.co-action.net/projects/OAsocieties current version of our list] is OA in an Excel spreadsheet under a Creative Commons Attribution license. We welcome additions and corrections. Phase Two has not yet begun.

* '''Survey of Authors Publishing in Open Access Journals with Article Processing Charges'''
** Investigators: David Solomon ([mailto:dsolomonmsuedu@gmail.com email]) and Bo-Christer Björk ([mailto:bo-christer.bjork@hanken.fi email])
** This project is a survey of authors who had published recently in OA journals that charge article processing fees (APCs).
*** The short survey focused on four areas: 1)The source of the funding used for paying the APC 2) Factors influencing the author’s choice of the journal which they published 3) The maximum APC the author would be willing to pay to publish an article in a desired journal 4) The number of peer-reviewed articles they had published over the last 5 years in subscription, OA and OA journals with APCs.
*** Article information including corresponding author's email address and country; the discipline discipline category (see below) and publisher of the journal; were retrieved off the journal web site from journals sampled from the DOAJ in seven discipline areas. 1) Health Sciences, Biology and Life Sciences 2) Education, Social Sciences, Law and Political Science 3)History and Archaeology, Arts and Architecture, Languages and Literatures 4) Technology, Engineering, Mathematic and Statistics, Computer Science 5) Business and Economics 6) Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Physics and Astronomy 7) Agriculture and Forestry. Approximately 15 articles generally from 2001 were sampled from each journal.
*** [http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc/survey.example.html An example of the survey]
*** A total of 1,038 authors from 74 journals were surveyed.
** The pilot of 123 authors from four journals has been completed and data collection from the main study largely been completed. We currently have approximately 410 completed surveys or about 40% of the surveyed authors. We hope to make some very preliminary results available in the next few weeks and have the complete survey results ready for publication this summer.

* '''The accessibility of open access scholarship in university libraries'''
** Investigator: Sigi Jottkandt ([mailto:sigij@openhumanitiespress.org email])
** This project looks at the cataloguing policies of international university libraries with respect to open access publications. It will be composed of a survey of large research university libraries to determine which libraries include specified OA journals in their OPACs, with a follow-up study of the OA-cataloguing libraries to try to establish the factors that led them to their decision.