Pontika at 00:17, 12 November 2009

2009-11-12T00:17:22Z

New page

==Read but not relevant==
*''' Au Yeung, C. M., Gibbins, N. and Shadbolt, N. (2007). [http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14869/1/tag_semantics.pdf Understanding the Semantics of Ambiguous Tags in Folksonomies]. In: The International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC 2007, 12 November 2007, Busan, South Korea'''.
Article saved as: yeung_2007
Bipartitioning, too technical

* '''Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Specia, L. Motta, E. (2007). Bridging the gap between folksonomies and the semantic web: an experience report'''
Article saved as: angeletou_2007
Combines it with existing online ontologies

* '''Grahl, M., Hotho, A., Stumme, G. (2007). [http://www.tagora-project.eu/wp-content/2007/06/grahl_iknow07.pdf Conceptual clustering of social bookmarking sites]. '''
Article saved as: grahl_2007
Too technical, bipartitioning

*'''Peters, I. (2006). [http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/content/forschung/publikationen/IsabellaPeters_onlineInformation.pdf Against folksonomies: indexing blogs and podcasts for corporate knowledge management]. Online information 2006, Conference Proceedings, London: Learned Information Europe, Ltd. '''
Article saved as: peters_2006
This article was not relevant, but in the lit review it was giving useful resources. I looked those resources and they were talking in general about folksonomies and tags and their problems, but they were not giving any solutions.

* '''Tonkin, E. (2006). Folksonomies: the fall and rise of plain-text tagging. Ariande, 47. '''
Not relevant, it talks about rich documentation-how to save urls, titles and create tags in combination with Dublin Core

* '''Kolbitsch, J. (2007). WordFlickr: a solution to the vocabulary problem in social tagging systems. '''
Not relevant, general overview about what tagging is and which are the most popular software.

* '''Dextre, Clarke S. (2001). Thesaural relationships, In: Relationships in the organization of knowledge, Carol A. Bean (edr.) Boston: Kluwer'''
Book
Not relevant, if focuses on thesauri relationships, which they cannot be applied in ontologies, as thesauri fail to create strict relationships like ontologies do.
There are three types of thesauri relationships: (a) equivalence, (b) hierarchical and (c) associative.

* '''[http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2008/kipp_2008.pdf Kipp, M. (2008). Toread and cool: subjective, affective and associative factors in tagging]'''
: This article is user-driven. The research conducted explores how users tag and what is that they are trying to describe when they tag.

* [http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Nancy%27s_project Nancy's project main page]

Read but not relevant - Revision history

Pontika at 00:17, 12 November 2009