MediaWiki API result

This is the HTML representation of the JSON format. HTML is good for debugging, but is unsuitable for application use.

Specify the format parameter to change the output format. To see the non-HTML representation of the JSON format, set format=json.

See the complete documentation, or the API help for more information.

{
    "batchcomplete": "",
    "continue": {
        "gapcontinue": "Research_questions",
        "continue": "gapcontinue||"
    },
    "warnings": {
        "main": {
            "*": "Subscribe to the mediawiki-api-announce mailing list at <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-api-announce> for notice of API deprecations and breaking changes."
        },
        "revisions": {
            "*": "Because \"rvslots\" was not specified, a legacy format has been used for the output. This format is deprecated, and in the future the new format will always be used."
        }
    },
    "query": {
        "pages": {
            "417": {
                "pageid": 417,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Read but not relevant",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "==Read but not relevant==\n*''' Au Yeung, C. M., Gibbins, N. and Shadbolt, N. (2007). [http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14869/1/tag_semantics.pdf Understanding the Semantics of Ambiguous Tags in Folksonomies]. In: The International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC 2007, 12 November 2007, Busan, South Korea'''.\nArticle saved as: yeung_2007\nBipartitioning, too technical\n\n* '''Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Specia, L. Motta, E. (2007). Bridging the gap between folksonomies and the semantic web: an experience report'''\nArticle saved as: angeletou_2007\nCombines it with existing online ontologies\n\n* '''Grahl, M., Hotho, A., Stumme, G. (2007). [http://www.tagora-project.eu/wp-content/2007/06/grahl_iknow07.pdf Conceptual clustering of social bookmarking sites]. '''\nArticle saved as: grahl_2007\nToo technical, bipartitioning\n\n*'''Peters, I. (2006). [http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/content/forschung/publikationen/IsabellaPeters_onlineInformation.pdf Against folksonomies: indexing blogs and podcasts for corporate knowledge management]. Online information 2006, Conference Proceedings, London: Learned Information Europe, Ltd.  '''\nArticle saved as: peters_2006\nThis article was not relevant, but in the lit review it was giving useful resources. I looked those resources and they were talking in general about folksonomies and tags and their problems, but they were not giving any solutions. \n\n* '''Tonkin, E. (2006). Folksonomies: the fall and rise of plain-text tagging. Ariande, 47. '''\nNot relevant, it talks about rich documentation-how to save urls, titles and create tags in combination with Dublin Core\n\n* '''Kolbitsch, J. (2007). WordFlickr: a solution to the vocabulary problem in social tagging systems. '''\nNot relevant, general overview about what tagging is and which are the most popular software. \n\n* '''Dextre, Clarke S. (2001). Thesaural relationships, In: Relationships in the organization of knowledge, Carol A. Bean (edr.) Boston: Kluwer'''\nBook\nNot relevant, if focuses on thesauri relationships, which they cannot be applied in ontologies, as thesauri fail to create strict relationships like ontologies do. \nThere are three types of thesauri relationships: (a) equivalence, (b) hierarchical and (c) associative.\n\n\n* '''[http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2008/kipp_2008.pdf Kipp, M. (2008). Toread and cool: subjective, affective and associative factors in tagging]'''\n: This article is user-driven. The research conducted explores how users tag and what is that they are trying to describe when they tag. \n\n\n* [http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Nancy%27s_project Nancy's project main page]"
                    }
                ]
            },
            "150": {
                "pageid": 150,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Research in progress",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "[[File:oad2.jpeg|60px]] This list is part of the [http://oad.simmons.edu Open Access Directory].\n\n* This is a list of active research projects on open access.  To keep entries short, please link to online descriptions or project pages when possible.  Please include contact information for the principal investigators.  \n\n* Related lists on OAD:  (1) [[Research questions]], and (2) [[Volunteer opportunities]].\n\n[[Category:Research about OA]][[Category:Working for OA]]\n\n----\n\n* '''Assessing of the Economic and Social Impact of the Public Domain in the Information Society'''\n** This is a project sponsored by the European Commission. Rightscom Ltd is the lead partner. More information on the project and the other project partners can be found [http://www.rightscom.com/Default.aspx?tabid=20397&referrertabid=21615 here]. The project is currently searching for any data sources that will help us to make estimates of the number of public domain works in the EU (literary and artistic works, music and audiovisual material). We are also interested in any data about how public domain works get used. If you can help please e-mail [email protected]. Many thanks in advance.\n\n* '''Defining and Measuring Success Variables of Open Access Journals''' \n** Investigators: Robin Peek ([mailto:[email protected] email]) and Athanasia Pontika \n** Funded by the Hollowell Research Fund. Open Access (OA) journals are being developed at an aggressive rate around the world but the number of journals can be deceptive because no research has been done to analyze how successful these journals are in establishing basic attributes such as gaining sufficient submissions to keep and maintain a routine publication schedule. [http://citesandinsights.info/v8i8c.htm Concerns] have been raised about how successful this influx of new journals can be (Crawford, August, 2008) and if any predictor variables may explain why some journals are more likely to succeed than others. The ease by which new journals can be created can and does mean that a journal might even become nothing more than an empty shell the little or no submissions, while other OA journals thrive.\n\n* ''' Gathering Firm Evidence on the Limits of Toll Access '''\n** Investigators: Bill Hooker ([mailto:[email protected] email]) and Graham Steel ([mailto:[email protected] email])\n** This project commenced in Sept '08 whilst in 'beta' within a FriendFeed room. As such, this represents a very small fraction of STM academics whose research is 'buffered' by TA. That said, the Investigators report (here) that this is a solid foundation for additional building upon. Similar to the above, the first results of Phase One were [http://www.scribd.com/doc/11738210/Refs-Wanted-Archive collated], Dec '08.\n** As matters stand (April '12), there are now 348 members of the [http://friendfeed.com/rooms/references-wanted References Wanted room] at FriendFeed. The Investigators are keen to roll this out a bit further, hence this inclusion in the OAD wiki.\n** initial statistics and some discussion of future directions [http://friendfeed.com/e/a9d0207c-5e83-483e-bbad-b3ddc1c97207/Refs-Wanted-infographic-07-Mar-2009/ here] and [http://ff.im/cCto1 here]\n\n* ''' It's time we capture those moments of individual frustration and turn them into positive change '''\n** [http://oabutton.wordpress.com/ OA Button]   \n** Main Investigators: David E Caroll and Joseph McArthur\n** Currently in Beta mode. Millions don\u2019t have access to research they need \u2013 we aim to turn these individual injustices into positive change. We\u2019re currently developing the open access button, described here. Throughout development we\u2019ll be posting news, thoughts, media and more on this site so check back regularly! We\u2019re looking for this to be a highly collaborative project, please get in touch with thoughts, suggestions, collaborations and anything else that takes your fancy. Also, we\u2019re mad about twitter \u2013 find us at [https://twitter.com/OA_Button @OAbutton] [http://www.openaccessbutton.org/ OA Button] officially launched 18th November 2013 during Berlin11. \n\n* '''How the NIH policy influences the authors' publishing decisions'''\n** This doctoral dissertation study explores how the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded principal investigators (PIs) view of open access and how the mandatory public access NIH policy has influenced their publishing behavior. Investigator: [mailto:[email protected] Athanasia (Nancy) Pontika].\n\n*'''Reuse of published scientific datasets'''\n**  Investigators:  Heather Piwowar ([mailto:[email protected] email]) and Todd Vision ([mailto:[email protected] email]), through [http://dataone.org/ DataONE]\n**  First, we are developing and evaluating scalable methods to track scientific dataset reuse.  We'll then analyze the dataset citations to understand the prevalence and patterns of reuse.  Initial approach depends on full-text mining of published literature for gene expression dataset accession numbers.  \n**  Motivation on [http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/studying-reuse-of-geo-datasets-in-the-published-literature blog], and details and open research notes at [http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/DataONE:GEO_reuse_study Open Wet Ware project page].\n\n* '''Society publishers with open access journals'''\n** Investigators:  Peter Suber ([mailto:[email protected] email]) and Caroline Sutton ([mailto:[email protected] email])\n** The project has two phases.  Phase One is to make a comprehensive list of scholarly societies worldwide that support gold OA for their own journals.  Phase Two will survey the societies discovered in Phase One in order to learn details about their turn to OA, their business models, and the financial and academic consequences of their OA policies.\n** The first results of Phase One were [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/11-02-07.htm#societies published] in ''SOAN'' for November 2007.  However, Phase One is not complete and we are still enlarging our list.  The [http://www.co-action.net/projects/OAsocieties current version of our list] is OA in an Excel spreadsheet under a Creative Commons Attribution license.  We welcome additions and corrections.  Phase Two has not yet begun.\n\n* '''Survey of Authors Publishing in Open Access Journals with Article Processing Charges'''\n** Investigators: David Solomon ([mailto:[email protected] email]) and Bo-Christer Bj\u00f6rk ([mailto:[email protected] email])\n** This project is a survey of authors who had published recently in OA journals that charge article processing fees (APCs). \n*** The short survey focused on four areas: 1)The source of the funding used for paying the APC 2) Factors influencing the author\u2019s choice of the journal which they published 3) The maximum APC the author would be willing to pay to publish an article in a desired journal 4) The number of peer-reviewed articles they had published over the last 5 years in subscription, OA and OA journals with APCs.\n*** Article information including corresponding author's email address and country; the discipline discipline category (see below) and publisher of the journal; were retrieved off the journal web site from journals sampled from the DOAJ in seven discipline areas. 1) Health Sciences, Biology and Life Sciences 2) Education, Social Sciences, Law and Political Science 3)History and Archaeology, Arts and Architecture, Languages and Literatures 4) Technology, Engineering, Mathematic and Statistics, Computer Science 5) Business and Economics 6) Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Physics and Astronomy 7) Agriculture and Forestry. Approximately 15 articles generally from 2001 were sampled from each journal.\n*** [http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc/survey.example.html An example of the survey] \n*** A total of 1,038 authors from 74 journals were surveyed.\n** The pilot of 123 authors from four journals has been completed and data collection from the main study largely been completed. We currently have approximately 410 completed surveys or about 40% of the surveyed authors. We hope to make some very preliminary results available in the next few weeks and have the complete survey results ready for publication this summer.\n\n* '''The accessibility of open access scholarship in university libraries'''\n** Investigator:  Sigi Jottkandt ([mailto:[email protected] email]) \n** This project looks at the cataloguing policies of international university libraries with respect to open access publications. It will be composed of a survey of large research university libraries to determine which libraries include specified OA journals in their OPACs, with a follow-up study of the OA-cataloguing libraries to try to establish the factors that led them to their decision."
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    }
}