Institutions implementing the DORA principles

This list is part of the Open Access Directory.


 * This list includes universities, research centers, research institutions, and funders taking measures to implement the 2013 principles of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).
 * There are two main sub-lists: (a) universities, research centers, etc. and (b) funders.
 * The list does not contain all DORA signatories, which can be found on the DORA website. It only includes those taking public steps to implement the principles.
 * Alphabetical within each section.

C

 * Cardiff University, UK. Statement on responsible research assessment, February 17, 2021. (perma.cc)

G

 * Ghent University, Belgium. Vision statement for evaluating research at Ghent University, November 8, 2016. (perma.cc)

I

 * Imperial College London, UK. Research evaluation. (perma.cc)

K

 * King's College London, UK. Changing hiring and promotion to recognise reproducible and transparent research practices. (perma.cc)

L

 * London School of Economics and Political, UK. Statement on the responsible use of citation metrics, 2016. (perma.cc)

M

 * Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. Responsible use of research metrics. (perma.cc)

S

 * St. George's, University of London, UK. Responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
 * Staffordshire University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, February 2020. (perma.cc)

U

 * University of Bath, UK. Principles of research assessment and management, February 2017. (perma.cc)
 * University of Birmingham, UK. Our commitment to responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
 * University of Bristol, UK. Responsible research evaluation. Statement on responsible research assessment. (perma.cc)
 * University of Cambridge, UK. The responsible use of metrics in research assessment. (perma.cc)
 * University of Cape Town, South Africa. Research assessment. UCT statement of support for the principles of the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (perma.cc)
 * University of Edinburgh, UK.
 * Research evaluation and responsible research metrics, February 5, 2021. (perma.cc)
 * Statement on the responsible use of research metrics, 2019. (perma.cc)


 * University of Glasgow, UK.
 * Research evaluation: talking about outputs. (perma.cc)
 * Statement on the use of quantitative indicators in the assessment of research quality. (perma.cc)


 * University of Hull, UK. Statement on the use of metrics in the assessment of research, May 2020. (perma.cc)
 * University of Kent, UK. Statement on fair assessment of research, February 2, 2022. (perma.cc)
 * University of Leeds, UK. Responsible metrics in the assessment of research. University of Leeds responsible research metrics assessment, September 2021. (perma.cc)
 * University of Oxford, UK. Principles to promote responsible use of research metrics, May 5, 2016. (perma.cc)
 * University of Portsmouth, UK. Research governance. (perma.cc)
 * University of Reading, UK.
 * Research integrity. (perma.cc)
 * Responsible metrics. Statement on responsible metrics for adoption, April 16, 2018. (perma.cc)


 * University of Southampton, UK. Responsible research metrics policy, November 20, 2019. (perma.cc)
 * University of St. Andrews, UK. Responsible metrics. (perma.cc)
 * University College Dublin, Ireland. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics in UCD. (perma.cc)
 * University College London, UK.
 * UCL and the San Francisco Declaration (DORA). (perma.cc)
 * Bibliometrics at UCL. (perma.cc)


 * University of York, UK. Policy for research evaluation using quantitative data. (perma.cc)

T

 * The Open University, UK. Statement on the responsible use of research metrics. (perma.cc)

T

 * Templeton World. Research assessment policy, 2021. (perma.cc)

U

 * UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). UKRI publishes new report on responsible research assessment, 2021. (perma.cc)

W

 * Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment. (perma.cc)