OA journal business models

From OAD

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hybrid OA journals)
(Hybrid OA journals)
Line 62: Line 62:
** ''Examples'':
** ''Examples'':
*** [http://ep.bmj.com/site/misc/unlocked.dtl BMJ Journals Unlocked] from the [http://group.bmj.com/group British Medical Journal (BMJ) Group].
*** [http://ep.bmj.com/site/misc/unlocked.dtl BMJ Journals Unlocked] from the [http://group.bmj.com/group British Medical Journal (BMJ) Group].
-
*** [http://royalsocietypublishing.org/site/authors/EXiS.xhtml EXiS Open Choice] from [http://royalsocietypublishing.org/ Royal Society Publishing].
 
*** [http://aslo.org/lo/information/freeaccess.html Free Access Publication] from the [http://aslo.org/ Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography].
*** [http://aslo.org/lo/information/freeaccess.html Free Access Publication] from the [http://aslo.org/ Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography].
*** [https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/3261.html Free to Read] from the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society].
*** [https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/3261.html Free to Read] from the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society].
Line 77: Line 76:
# ''Variant''.  The journal promises to reduce the subscription price in proportion to author uptake of the OA option.  (Failure to do so is sometimes called the "double charge" business model.)
# ''Variant''.  The journal promises to reduce the subscription price in proportion to author uptake of the OA option.  (Failure to do so is sometimes called the "double charge" business model.)
#* ''Example''. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/stream?pageId=4088&level=2#4092 Cambridge Open] from [http://www.cambridge.org/ Cambridge University Press] is an "experiment" and "uptake will be monitored and future subscription prices will be modified to take into account the level of interest and uptake in this model".
#* ''Example''. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/stream?pageId=4088&level=2#4092 Cambridge Open] from [http://www.cambridge.org/ Cambridge University Press] is an "experiment" and "uptake will be monitored and future subscription prices will be modified to take into account the level of interest and uptake in this model".
 +
#* ''Example''. [http://royalsocietypublishing.org/site/authors/EXiS.xhtml EXiS Open Choice] from [http://royalsocietypublishing.org/ Royal Society Publishing], starting in [http://royalsocietypublishing.org/site/authors/EXiS.xhtml#question2 2012] has "implement[ed] a new and more transparent pricing policy in which the price of each journal is tied to the number of non-open access articles published in that journal and each journal will publish the relevant article counts annually".
# ''Variant''.  The journal allows authors who select the OA option to retain copyright, or to retain more rights than authors who do not select the OA option.
# ''Variant''.  The journal allows authors who select the OA option to retain copyright, or to retain more rights than authors who do not select the OA option.
# ''Variant''.  The journal uses CC licenses (or equivalent) for the OA articles, even if it doesn't do so for its other articles.
# ''Variant''.  The journal uses CC licenses (or equivalent) for the OA articles, even if it doesn't do so for its other articles.

Revision as of 22:15, 22 February 2012

Oad2.jpeg This list is part of the Open Access Directory.

  • This is a list of business models and revenue sources for OA journals.
  • Some revenue sources are supplementary and not sufficient. We aim to include all the revenue sources actually used by OA journals, even if they are small parts of larger business models.
  • For the time being, the major categories are in alphabetical order, which does not reflect their relative prevalence.

Contents

Advertising

  • Description. The model is to use advertising on the journal's web site or article pages in order to generate income to help support the journal.
  1. Variant. A journal or its publisher can sell advertising space to companies willing to advertise in the journal. This usually requires a marketing staff.
  2. Variant. A journal can use a service like Google AdSense, which places ads on pages based on an algorithmic reading of their content. These services require no marketing staff. Because the journal doesn't know in advance what ads will be placed, this method can answer suspicions that advertising compromises editorial integrity.

Endowments

Fund-raising

  • Description. The model is to solicit donations, periodically or continuously.
  1. Variant. A journal may solicit donations through an embedded PayPal or Google Checkout widget.

Hybrid OA journals

  1. Variant. The journal promises to reduce the subscription price in proportion to author uptake of the OA option. (Failure to do so is sometimes called the "double charge" business model.)
    • Example. Cambridge Open from Cambridge University Press is an "experiment" and "uptake will be monitored and future subscription prices will be modified to take into account the level of interest and uptake in this model".
    • Example. EXiS Open Choice from Royal Society Publishing, starting in 2012 has "implement[ed] a new and more transparent pricing policy in which the price of each journal is tied to the number of non-open access articles published in that journal and each journal will publish the relevant article counts annually".
  2. Variant. The journal allows authors who select the OA option to retain copyright, or to retain more rights than authors who do not select the OA option.
  3. Variant. The journal uses CC licenses (or equivalent) for the OA articles, even if it doesn't do so for its other articles.
  4. Variant. The journal makes the OA articles the same versions that it publishes in the paid journal. (The alternative is to make the OA articles a truncation or abridgment of the TA editions, e.g. without links to references.)
  5. Variant. The journal insists that the OA editions only appear on its own web site. (The alternative is to allow authors to deposit their OA articles in repositories independent of the publisher.)
  6. Variant. The journal waives the fee for the OA option in cases of economic hardship.
  7. Variant. The journal offers the OA option without any fee at all, or at a discounted fee, for authors in certain categories, for example, authors who are members of a certain society, authors who are employees of a subscribing institution, authors who serve as an editor or referee for one of the publisher's journals, authors from certain designated developing countries, and so on.
  8. Variant. The journal charges one fee for OA articles that also appear in the non-OA edition available to subscribers, and a lower fee for OA articles that do not appear in the non-OA edition.
  9. Variant. The journal refuses to publish work by authors bound by OA mandates (from funders or universities) unless those authors select the OA option and pay the associated fee.
  10. Variant. The journal rescinds or limits its permission for self-archiving at the same time that it adopts a hybrid OA model, in order to steer authors who want OA away from (no-fee) self-archiving and toward the (fee-based) hybrid option.

Institutional subsidies

  • Description. The model is for an institution to subsidize an OA journal, in whole or part, directly or indirectly. It may provide cash, facilities, equipment, or personnel. The institution may be of any kind, for example, a university, laboratory, research center, library, learned society, museum, hospital, for-profit corporation, non-profit organization, foundation, or government agency.
  1. Variant: university subsidies. There are many forms of university subsidies for OA journals: in-house publication of OA journals; funds to pay publication fees at fee-based OA journals; and provision of facilities, equipment, or personnel. (Note that many of these subsidies are also used by TA journals.)
    • Example. Philosophers' Imprint is edited by philosophy faculty and published by librarians at the University of Michigan. Because the university already pays the salaries of these employees, and allows them to give some of their working time to the journal, the journal needn't charge reader-side subscription fees or author-side publication fees.
    • Examples. Many universities have created funds to pay publication fees at fee-based OA journals. See our comprehensive list of OA journal funds.
  2. Variant: government subsidies. There are many forms of government subsidies for OA journals: direct grants to OA journals or publishers; grants to researchers which they may use for publication fees or page charges at OA journals; in-house publication of OA journals; tax deductions for non-profit publishers of OA journals; budgetary support for public universities which the institutions may use to publish OA journals, subsidize OA journals, or hire faculty who spend part of their work-time editing OA journals. (Note that many of these subsidies are also used by TA journals.)
  3. Variant: foundation subsidies.
  4. Variant: corporate subsidies.
  5. Variant: consortial subsidies. This clearly overlaps with the categories above (university, government, foundation, and corporate subsidies). What's notable is that an OA resource can build a customized or ad hoc coalition of supporting organizations.

Membership dues

  • Description. The model is for a membership organization, like a learned society, to use membership dues to support an OA journal, in whole or part. (See "Institutional subsidies".)
    • For potential examples, see the 425 learned societies publishing OA journals identified by Peter Suber and Caroline Sutton 2007. We say "potential" examples because the Suber-Sutton research doesn't (yet) break down the society OA journals by business model.

Priced editions

  • Description. The model is for a journal to provide OA to one edition and sell access to another edition. The OA edition should contain the full text and other information (charts, illustrations, links, etc.), but the priced edition may appear earlier in time or include extra features, such as print.
  1. Variant: Revenue from a priced print edition supports an OA edition, with or without a delay in the release of the OA edition.
  2. Variant: The priced and OA editions contain the same texts and appear at the same time, but differ in production quality.
    • Example: The Annals of Improbable Research has published four versions of each article since December 2007: priced print, priced hi-res PDF, free low-res PDF, and free HTML. (Don't be misled by the fact that AIR isn't a "serious" journal. It still needs a serious business model.)
    • Example: Cléo (Centre pour l'édition électronique ouverte) has used the OpenEdition Fremium business model for books and journals since February 2011. Under this model, HTML editions are OA and PDF edition are TA.
  3. Variant: The priced edition contains short summaries and the OA edition contains full texts (as opposed to the other way around).
    • Example: Since January 2010, BMJ has published one-page pico summaries of its OA research articles in the print, TA edition of BMJ. A BMJ survey showed that users were more likely to read the TA edition if it contained these summaries. (If intelligent abridgment catches on as a form of added value, then full-text OA becomes much easier to support. More comments.)
  4. Variant: The publisher sells reprints or offprints to help support an OA journal.
  5. Variant: The publisher subsidizes its OA publications with profits or revenue from a separate line of non-OA publications.

Publication fees

  • Description. The model is to charge a fee upon acceptance of an article for publication. (Note: Raym Crow's 2009 guide "Income models for Open Access: An overview of current practice" indicates that "Almost half of open-access journals levy publication fees...and such fees represent about 30% of the revenue generated by open-access journals"; see here for more detail.) The idea is for the fee to cover the costs of production, although in practice it might cover more or less. Because rejected articles pay no publication fees (but see "submission fees" below), the publication fee must cover the costs of publishing the accepted article plus the cost of reviewing the number of submissions rejected for each accepted submission. Because costs per accepted paper rise with the rejection rate, the fee must rise with the rejection rate. The bill may go to the author, but is often paid by the author's funder or employer rather than by the author out of pocket. Hence this model is sometimes, misleadingly, called the "author pays" or "author fee" model. The fee is sometimes called a "processing fee" or an "article processing charge" (APC). Note that a growing number of universities have funds to pay these fees on behalf of their faculty.
  1. Variant: Flat fees. The journal charges the same fee for every accepted article.
  2. Variant: Variable fees. Fee size depends on article length.
  3. Variant: Fee discounts or waivers for economic hardship. Some OA journals waive or reduce publication fees in cases of economic hardship. Some do it for all authors from certain, designated developing countries. Some do it on request, no questions asked.
  4. Variant: Fee discounts for author assistance. Some OA journals, such as Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, reduce their publication fee for authors who submit their manuscripts in a certain file format or who choose to do their own copy-editing.
  5. Variant: One price for ordinary production, with extra charges for extra services.
    • Example: Optics Express charges a general publication fee and charges extra for copy editing, if needed.
  6. Variant: Institutional memberships. Some OA journals and publishers offer institutional memberships. The chief benefit of membership is that the journal waives or reduces publication fees for authors affiliated with member-institutions. Some charge a flat fee for membership. Some charge an amount linked to the number of articles published in the journal by the institution's employees. The more journals offered by a publisher (or more precisely, the more journals where institutional employees are likely to publish), the more valuable the membership is for members. In that sense, institutional membership are another way in which large publishers can benefit from economies of scale.
  7. Variant: Institutional arrangements without memberships. Some OA publishers strike individual deals with individual institutions.
  8. Variant: Fee-based OA for some topics, no-fee OA for other topics:

Submission fees

  • Description. The model is to charge a fee for evaluating a submitted paper, whether or not the paper is later accepted. A submission fee may be in addition to a publication fee (see "Publication fees" above). Submission fees can reduce publication fees at journals with high rejection rates.
    • Example. Journal of Medical Internet Research. See JMIR's fee schedule.
    • Example. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution charges a $400 CAD submission fee, and uses $300 CAD of it to pay referees. If the paper is accepted for publication, IEE also charges a $300 CAD publication fee.
    • For more discussion, see the December 2010 report by Mark Ware (published by Knowledge Exchange). At p. 4, Ware lists 20 examples of OA journals charging submission fees, along with the fee amounts, the journal publishers, and the journal impact factors.

Volunteer effort

  • Description. The model is to use unpaid volunteers for some of the work in producing the journal. All scholarly journals (OA and TA) use volunteers to some extent, as authors, referees, and/or some kinds of editors.
    • Note. When a volunteer has a salary from another organization, and is allowed by that organization to spend some professional time on the journal, then the institution is directly or indirectly subsidizing the journal. (See "Institutional subsidies" above.) When the journal work is an overload, then the volunteer's employer is not subsidizing the journal. However, because it is often difficult to tell whether work is an overload (inside or outside a job description), it is often difficult to distinguish volunteer effort from institutional subsidy.
Personal tools
Open Access Directory